Hyperpat\’s HyperDay

SF, science, and daily living

The SF Info-Dump

Posted by hyperpat on April 6, 2007

SF writers have had a problem since about day one of the genre. As the story must, in some way, involve science for the story to actually qualify as science fiction, and the average reader’s knowledge of said science cannot be assumed to be anything more than minimal, somewhere along the line the writer must explain whatever scientific theory, gadget, or fact that the story uses. This requirement is unique to the genre, and can make it far more difficult to write than conventional stories, as somehow interest in the story must be maintained while all this information is imparted.

Over the years, several methods have been used to accomplish this task, some of which are clearly better than others, and some of which are suited only for certain types of situations, stories, and scientific levels.

1. The ‘classic’ info-dump. In this method the story gets interrupted by a mini-lesson in whatever science is relevant. Whether this is handled in third-person omniscient mode, where the info might just have well have come straight out of a science textbook, or delivered via ‘dialogue’ between the story’s characters, this method has the severe disadvantage of being essentially a lecture to the reader. As the reader is looking for entertainment rather than a science lesson, most readers encountering this will be disappointed and unhappy with the story. Many stories from the twenties to the forties used this method, and reading them today is a sometimes painful experience, as in general this is just bad writing. Especially if these info-dumps start off with something like: “Hey, Jack, I know that you’re already aware of most of this, but just to make sure you understand how this little gizmo works…” followed by three pages of semi-scientific gobbledy-gook. Unfortunately, this method still gets used today, sometimes by writers who should know better. It does have the advantage of allowing a very direct explanation for whatever piece of science you are using, and if it is limited to very short expositions it can work. However, much of today’s ‘hard’ SF is dealing with very esoteric theories, environments, concepts, and hardware; being able to explain these items in very short info-lets is probably impossible.

2. Drive the exposition from a direct need-to-know by the point-of-view character. This is the method that Heinlein practically pioneered and perfected, as shown in his Have Space-Suit, Will Travel – when his main character has just gotten a space-suit and needed to repair it, it was fairly easy to insert engineering details about how such suits are constructed and why they are built that way, without losing connection with either the story flow or reader interaction. This method is excellent for those items that have concrete relevance to the story’s action. It does not work so well if what is being described is more theory than practical application of that theory.

3. Create futuristic ‘Headlines’ that describe the theory, invention, or relevant history. These must be brief, and preferably part of other ‘headlines’ that have relevance to the story. This has the advantage of being part of a story ‘interruption’ that nevertheless moves the story forward by providing proper background and that is more acceptable to the reader than pure exposition. Some of John Brunner’s novels used this method to very good effect.

4. Don’t explain it at all. This has the obvious disadvantage that it may leave the reader totally at sea, but if the function of whatever gizmo is being used is derivable from context, it may be all that’s needed. Imagine a cave-man reading the following:

“He rolled out of bed and propped open his eyes. Shuffling into the kitchen, he turned on the coffee pot and went to grab the newspaper. Returning, the fresh coffee aroma started to clear his head, and his first sip went a long way towards making the day look bearable.”

The cave-man would know nothing about electricity, coffee pots, or even what coffee was – but he could tell from this that the pot was a device for making a drinkable item that had invigorating effects, and that the coffee pot works pretty quickly. And this may be all the information the reader needs to know about this device.

A sub-class of this method is to present the futuristic item as a commonplace of the day, not worthy of comment. Obsessing over the ‘gee-whizness’ of some gadget will, in general, take away from the focus on your story and characters. Once again, this is something Heinlein did well, such as his one-liner in Space Cadet about using a microwave oven (written in 1948 before such items became a reality).

Context can be much wider than just the direct sentence(s) describing the item of interest. Especially for setting up a social environment, it’s frequently better if how the world got to its current condition is not explained directly (at least not immediately), but the reader can see how this society operates from what is happening now. Things like Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Orwell’s 1984, Heinlein’s Friday all benefit from having the story delineate the current society, rather than have some long treatise on the ‘history’ of how the world got this way. Sometimes this involves just what effect a gadget has on society’s customs and mores – just think what today’s society would be like if the automobile had never been invented, for instance.

There is another sub-class of this, that of those items that have a long history of being used within the field, things like FTL drives, telepathy, time machines, etc. Unless your story really depends on the details of these things, they can often be taken as ‘givens’, mere background for your story setting. Of course, once again, a reader with little exposure to these customary artifacts may not be able to take all of this in stride, so using these devices this way may limit your audience – but then again, explaining all of these when they are not the prime movers of your story will definitely bore a veteran reader of the field.

5. Provide partial and/or very abbreviated explanations. This method frequently assumes that the reader knows a fair amount of conventional science, and that he can pick up on things like references to the Lorentz contraction effect, Bose-Einstein condensates, quantum ‘entanglement’, or other such items which are pretty well known to science students and rocket scientists, but frequently are little known outside those circles (and yes, there are some rocket scientists who read this stuff – which just means that what science you do put in had better be accurate). This seems to be the method of choice for several recent ‘hard’ SF novels I’ve read., and while this is generally OK for the veteran reader of SF, it probably precludes these types of books from gaining a wide audience. But when you’re trying to present a whole host of scientific data points (say, your story line depends on the gravitational and magnetic properties of super-Jupiter sub-dwarfs, nano-tech, computer uploads of the human conciousness, genetic and mental engineering far beyond today’s capabilities, and super-cold organic chemistry, to name just a few items in one recent book I’ve read, it may be the only viable choice).

Right now there seems to be a pretty sharp divide between what are typically known as ‘hard’ SF works and those that deal more with the softer, social aspects. Far too much of the ‘hard’ variety is either inaccessible to the average non-sf, non-science trained reader, or becomes mind-bogglingly difficult to understand, even with extended explanations that make the reader stop cold while he tries to assimilate the information. While the ‘softer’ stuff is just that, and sometimes it doesn’t satisfy that yearning for the ‘sense of wonder’ that marvelous ideas and gadgets can engender. But if SF doesn’t wish to go the way of the dodo bird, it needs to get far more proficient in presenting its ideas such that Mr. Average Joe can still comprehend and enjoy the story.


7 Responses to “The SF Info-Dump”

  1. fencer said

    I’m a real fan of John Brunner’s books, and I remember clearly the method of headlines that you describe. He’s one of the underappreciated scifi authors that should be better recognized.

    Thanks for this post, very interesting…


  2. hyperpat said

    When Brunner started doing this in Stand on Zanzibar, it was only part of the overall mosaic structure of the book, and was therefore immediately labeled as being part of the ‘New Wave’ stuff. But the headline method stretches back a lot further; even some of stories from the forties used it – and remember the headlines in Stranger in Strange Land?

    Brunner is underrated. A lot of his early work is eminently forgettable, but somewhere around 1964 he seem to mature as a writer and suddenly produced a whole series of books that are good reading: The Whole Man, Stand on Zanzibar, The Jagged Orbit, The Sheep Look Up, The Squares of the City, etc. But the label of ‘workman hack’ that he acquired from his early work seemed to stick around, unfairly I think.

  3. Fred Kiesche said

    Look to John Dos Passos’ USA Trilogy (The 42nd Parallel, 1919 and The Big Money) for the model Brunner used in writing Stand on Zanzibar. Brunner is one of my favorites, and I wish that more of his stuff was back in print.

    As for the info-dump, it’s too bad “hyperbooks” really haven’t been explored. You could have the best of both worlds there. Write the story with all the background implied, but have links that would allow those with the interest to pursue the background. Sort of like an annotated volume.

  4. hyperpat said

    Perhaps that will be a viable option sometime in the future – it certainly would alleviate the worst of the info-dump problem. Unfortunately, so far reading a novel on a full-sized computer is something that most people avoid as not comfortable or convenient, and the various e-book readers are too expensive, specialized, or have other ergonomic problems for more than a very small number of people to use them.

    The ‘New Wave’ stylistic tricks weren’t ‘new’ as far as literature went – just new within the SF field. It was certainly something that the field needed; these new ways to present a story beside a straightforward linear narrative gave the writers more options that were often more in keeping with their subject material, and added a richness of effect that had been lacking.

  5. Fred Kiesche said

    I have about 4,000 eBook titles of various lengths. I read several eBooks a year on a fairly common PDA. Don’t get a dedicated reader, that is the expensive route. Get a PDA and use texts from Baen, Project Gutenberg and the like, or eBook readers that are simple, install on your PDA as well as your desktop, etc.–stuff like Mobipocket, TomeRaider, etc.

    Great for making annotations and the like without marking up precious hardcovers and the like!

  6. Roger McMillian said

    With all of the trouble I’ve been having with eliminating info-dumps in my first novel, I’d like to see something like a hyper-text based reader. Then, I could insert HTML codes on relationships, events, terms and technology that I’m currently explaining in the dumps.

    Until they come up with one that’s affordable and reliable, I’ll keep trying.

  7. hyperpat said

    Greg Egan in his Incandescence did something of a compromise. There’s quite a bit of info dump in the novel, but what’s there is pretty much the bare bones minimum necessary to educate the less-knowledgeable reader in the facts and specifics of his situation. The full explanation, along with some nice animated gifs and the real equations, are on his web site. How many readers actually visited his site to find out all of this I don’t know, but I was glad to see it – his method doesn’t unnecessarily bog the casual reader down in excessive info, but for those interested (or just totally confused) there is a path to more in-depth info.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: