Hyperpat\’s HyperDay

SF, science, and daily living

Social Relativity

Posted by hyperpat on January 11, 2007

Are there moral absolutes? The average person would probably say yes, and list murder, theft, rape, and incest as examples of things that are always wrong. But are they really?

Let’s take murder first. Our laws recognize ‘justifiable homicide’ for some case of this. Under certain provocations, we recognize that murder may be a reasonable and justifiable action, such as catching someone trying to rape your wife, when your own life is in danger, performing a legally sanctioned execution, killing an opposing soldier during wartime, killing one member of group to save the rest, ‘a crime of passion’ where it can be argued that you are not totally sane at that moment, and possibly a few other cases. Nor is this restricted to just US laws, but similar items are found in most countries, and historically most cultures have allowed for something like the cases mentioned. So clearly ‘murder’ is not an absolute no-no.

Theft also has cases where it may be considered justified. In general, those situations where the theft would ameliorate a worse condition, such as stealing food when starving, fall under this umbrella. At one point, theft of your enemy’s horses was considered not just OK, but an action to be strived for in some American Indian cultures.

Rape may possibly be the closest to being considered wrong in all societies and times, but even this act was at the very least condoned by many armies, and offered as part of the rewards for fighting. And in many cultures the man, as supreme power, used rape as a means of emphasizing his absolute authority, or to enhance his reputation with other men by performing such a boastable act. I will note that almost all the cases where it is considered ‘acceptable’ it is in a totally male dominated culture. I know of no cases from the female side that think this action is acceptable.

Incest really doesn’t even belong in the same category as the rest, as it does not involve non-consent by the ‘injured’ party (note I’m not talking about ‘power’ situations in some families between father and daughter – these situations fall more under the rape category than here). It’s basis for being considered ‘wrong’ is that it can often lead to deformed/crippled children due to bad gene reinforcement. But some cultures had some very prominent cases of it, most visibly in the Egyptian and Hawaiian royal lines, and these were not only socially acceptable, in some cases Egyptian royal ladies had no one else they could marry other than their brothers who were of equivalent social station.

Thus it would seem that there is little to justify the idea of a moral ‘absolute’. Different cultures and circumstances alter what actions are acceptable. This does not mean that morals have no place in the world or have no benefits. Morals are guiding principles that can allow the members of any given society to live together in relative harmony. Absolute or not, violation of them can and should lead to serious consequences in whatever society you happen to live in. And if you visit a culture that is widely different from your own, you would be well advised to find out just what differences there are in this area, and conform to whatever they are, else you’ll be fated to end up like the pink monkey thrown in with a group of brown ones.

2 Responses to “Social Relativity”

  1. I am having to write a research paper on: The relativity of Crimes and have chose to write on Rape cases. I have to give 3 Case Examples. Any help would be very much appreciated.
    My Plan so far:
    1st case: the Duke lacrose Team Case
    2nd case Women in Saudi Arabia punished for being raped
    3rd case; Following WWII the war crimes of the japenese on women called “Care Givers,” that was actually raped all the time.
    Germany had to pay $65 Billion in Compensations for War Crimes and japan has yet to pay a dime. I guess they wanted just to leave it alone.

    Any better ideas to get a good grade in my criminology Class?

    Terry Duncan
    1st SGT, US ARMY Retired
    terryduncan@charter.net

  2. hyperpat said

    While I can’t immediately think of specific cases to fill out your concepts, a couple of things spring to mind:

    At least in the US, many women prefer not to report or press charges for rape. This is mainly due to the adversarial nature of our courts, where the woman doing the complaining (the victim!) is forced to defend herself from charges that she ‘enticed’ the male into the action, or gave implied consent. This is just about a complete reversal of the normal case, where the victim of whatever crime is assumed to be the person wronged, and the only question is whether the defendant was actually the person who committed the crime. There always seems to be an implied attitude that men would not perform such an action unless there was some provocation; that the female is always the one at fault. While this attitude has changed somewhat over the years, to where now there have been at least a few cases of women accusing their husband of rape and winning, and greater prosecution of ‘date rape’, it’s still pretty prevalent. This attitude has at least some roots in Biblical teachings, where women are frequently portrayed as temptresses, leading their men astray, part of an overall attitude that men are the only ones qualified to hold power and make decisions. Most of this would probably be items to bring up in your coverage of the Duke team.

    The influence of religion on cultural attitudes about rape is strong, as is very obvious in your second case choice. Islamic societies are near total patriarchies, and it could be argued that the more patriarchal a society is, the more the woman is blamed for rape (this also applies to the Japanese case – the concept there was that it is the proper function of women to provide sexual favors, and forcing woman to live up to their proper function was not a criminal act).

    Unfortunately there are very few matriarchal societies that could be used to show if the attitude towards rape is different in such societies. Perhaps you can find some relevant information on rape attitudes in pre-Western contact Hawaii (a more matriarchal society than most)?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: